RE: Link

The issue has already been decided at the level of the Supreme Court and the case will be summarily tossed and there will be Rule 11 sanctions imposed on Worthington's lawyer.

Yes, this is definitly true. As in the previous lawsuit that was tossed out, Chip Worthington , ET AL, have no comprehension of the law nor Indian history particularly regarding Indian aboriginal territory. He apperas he is staying the course *uniformed and misinformed) because it appears he iand STC101 is being payed off by the bay area card houses who will lose business when the much anticipated Rohnert Park Casino opens. Instead of fighting a sure to fail battle to stop the casino, Chip Worthington should have worked with the Indians to mitagate the project's impacts. That way he would not have given the appearance of being a jackass.

The issues raised seem to largely be settled law as noted above. If that is indeed the case I'm left to wonder why counsel would file the action at all. I've not read the complaint, but now I am definitely interested to see what kind of foundation is alleged for the action.

Some people, however, just seem to feel the need to go on a Quixotic crusade. For better or worse, I don't know the guy personally, perhaps that is Mr. Worthington's angle.